Tesla 株主総会が10/7に開催されます

TeslaのProxy Statementを眺めています。

・9人の取締役は3つのクラスに分かれています。任期が3年、期差選任、staggered boardです。今回はクラスⅡの2名の選任案(ひとりnot-standになっています)、9名から8名の取締役会となります。水野さんはElon Muskさんと同じClassⅠ。女性は2名。

・会社提案に取締役任期を3年から2年にするというのがあるので、これが2/3以上の賛成を得れば、two classes with staggered two-year terms になる。会社はForを推奨、以下のように理由を記載。While the Board fully supports giving our stockholders a greater voice by allowing them to vote on the performance of our directors with greater frequency, the Board also believes that it would not be in the best interests of Tesla and its stockholders at this time to subject the entire Board to an annual re-election.
Proposal5の株主提案では1年にというのがあるがこちらは会社はAgainst推奨。ISSは多分Forでしょう。

・水野さんは以下のように記載。
Hiromichi Mizuno has been a member of the Board since April 2020.
Since January 2021, Mr. Mizuno has served as the United Nations Special Envoy on Innovative Finance and Sustainable Investments.
From January 2015 to March 2020, Mr. Mizuno was Executive Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Japan’s Government Pension Investment Fund, the largest pension fund in the world.
Previously, Mr. Mizuno was a partner at Coller Capital, a private equity firm, from 2003.
In addition to being a career-long finance and investment professional, Mr. Mizuno has served as a board member of numerous business, government and other organizations, currently including the Mission  Committee of Danone S.A., a global food products company, and the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council.
Mr. Mizuno is also involved in academia, having  been named to leadership or advisory roles at Harvard University, Oxford University, University of Cambridge, Northwestern University and Osaka University. Mr. Mizuno holds a B.A. in Law from Osaka City University and an M.B.A. from the Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University. 

We believe that Mr. Mizuno possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of the Board, including his deep understanding of international economics, financial markets and government policies. 

・Proposal3、ELIMINATE APPLICABLE SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS

2020年の株主提案(non-binding)で過半数55.7%:For/(For+Against+Abstain)の賛成を受けて今年提案したけど、発行済み株式数の33.4%の賛成でしかないので2/3以上の賛成は無理でしょうということで、会社側の推奨はない、None です。ISSはForでしょう。
(2020年の総会結果)

f:id:MMikio:20211006213930p:plain

As of the Record Date, holders of common stock were eligible to cast an aggregate of 185,475,491 votes at the 2020 Annual Meeting. とあったので、62212916/185475491=33.5%

・Proposal6は、Calvert Research and ManagementからDiversity & Inclusion関連の株主提案。会社側は、2020年12月に初めて Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Impact Reportを出し、2021年8月にはAnnual Impact Reportにまとめ、DEI(Diversity, Equity and Inclusion)情報を公開しているのでAgainstを推奨。

・Proposal7は、Nia Impact Capitalからrequesting reporting on the impact of employee arbitration on workplace cultureの提案。仲裁(arbitration)を利用することでテスラの職場環境の本当の情報を得ることが難しい、制限されるのできちんとレポーティングしてくださいという提案?、よくわかりません。会社はAgainstを推奨。Nia Impact Capitalから追加の資料がでています。

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318605/000121465921009522/j913212px14a6g.htm

・Proposal8は、Comptroller of the City of New Yorkから ASSIGNING RESPONSIBILITY FOR STRATEGIC OVERSIGHT OF HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT TO AN INDEPENDENT BOARD-LEVEL COMMITTEE の提案。すでに取り組んでますということで会社はAgainstを推奨。

・Proposal9は、Sisters of the Good Shepherd New York Provinceから、ADDITIONAL REPORTING ON HUMAN RIGHTSの提案。Annual Impact Reportで開示している、今後も進化させていくので会社はAgainstを推奨。

・Proposal6から9、ISSの推奨はForでしょうね。

 

以上です

2021/10/11 テスラの総会の様子はYouTubeで観れます。EVsmartBlogに総会のまとめがあります。

2021年テスラ株主総会~イーロン・マスク氏プレゼンのポイント【まとめ】 - EVsmartブログ

テスラ2021年株主総会『質疑応答』〜気になるポイントを翻訳解説 - EVsmartブログ

2021//10/19、総会結果

Proposal 1

The individuals listed below were elected as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting to serve on Tesla’s Board of Directors (“Board”) for a term of three years or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified.

                                 For                  Against         Abstained      Broker Non-Votes

James Murdoch  411,565,464   175,158,627        6,616,291         172,084,569

Kimbal Musk      473,486,890    117,345,144        2,508,349        172,084,569

 

Proposal 2

Proposal 2 was a management proposal to adopt amendments to Tesla’s certificate of incorporation to reduce director terms to two years. This proposal was not approved because it did not constitute at least 66 2/3% of the total outstanding shares of Tesla’s common stock.

         For           Against      Abstained       Broker Non-Votes

590,125,430   2,685,981        529,202          172,084,569

 

Proposal 3

Proposal 3 was a management proposal to adopt amendments to Tesla’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws to eliminate applicable supermajority voting requirements. This  proposal was not approved because it did not constitute at least 66 2/3% of the total outstanding shares of Tesla’s common stock.

    For                 Against       Abstained             Broker Non-Votes

358,741,943   38,348,031      194,487,735             173,847,242

 

Proposal 4

Proposal 4 was a management proposal to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. This proposal was approved.

        For          Against          Abstained       Broker Non-Votes

759,521,206  4,675,596         1,228,380           —

 

Proposal 5

Proposal 5 was a non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding reduction of director terms to one year.  This stockholder proposal was approved.

      For                Against          Abstained           Broker Non-Votes

314,635,765   260,929,367    17,775,250             172,084,569

 

Proposal 6

Proposal 6 was a non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding additional reporting on diversity and inclusion efforts.  This stockholder proposal was approved.

        For               Against        Abstained       Broker Non-Votes

323,395,861  244,892,561       25,052,192      172,084,569

 

Proposal 7

Proposal 7 was a non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding reporting on employee arbitration.  This stockholder proposal was not approved.

      For               Against        Abstained      Broker Non-Votes

265,528,657  307,087,258     20,724,698        172,084,569

 

Proposal 8

Proposal 8 was a non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding assigning responsibility for strategic oversight of human capital management to an independent board-level committee.  This stockholder proposal was not approved.

         For             Against         Abstained     Broker Non-Votes

187,798,567  368,603,592      36,938,454        172,084,569

 

Proposal 9

Proposal 9 was a non-binding advisory stockholder proposal regarding additional reporting on human rights.  This stockholder proposal was not approved.

        For            Against       Abstained   Broker Non-Votes

148,684,322  427,124,353  17,531,938     172,084,569